Contract, word order, and conjunction in certain types of Arabic

14

Contract, word order, and conjunction in certain types of Arabic

  • ^ The 5 sandwich-version of fillers have been: hybrid contract nouns which have good possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbor,” where komsija is also end in M or F agreement), such as (15b); crossbreed contract nouns that have good possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my laugher,” in which cerekalo can produce Meters or N arrangement), such as (15c); NSg animate nouns which have an enthusiastic ordinal amount [prvo prase “(the) earliest pig,” in which prase has a hybrid plural mode, triggering FSg otherwise NPl agreement], as in (15d); typical agreement nouns having a beneficial MSg nominal fit [uspeh dekana “(the) triumph (of your own) dean,” the spot where the genitive fit is actually homonymous on the paucal, in addition to paucal lets paucal and MPl arrangement], as in (15e); normal agreement MSg nouns with a beneficial PP complement (prijatelj iz skole “this new buddy from college,” in which attraction outcomes was requested), such as (15f).
  • ^ The new salience of the examples is actually managed about adopting the ways. Earliest, that writer invented the newest instances centered on their intuition, therefore the most other evaluated them; in which conflict came up, instances was changed and also the techniques are repeated for the freshly produced examples.
  • ^ The significance of the difference between contract habits within the condition try orthogonal to the hypotheses on the attract of the report, because they simply generate forecasts in regards to the cousin quantities within requirements, or between the standards and ft-range ratios. We statement this type of screening in the interest of completeness of one’s statement, once the told of the publishers of one’s regularity.
  • ^ We have tailored and you will applied yet another check out in this way, and we also are considering the information and knowledge.

Sources

Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effect of animacy and you will agentivity to the running out-of contract inside Serbo-Croatian,” within the Education from inside the Languages and you may Head, Picked papers regarding 3rd Novi Sad Working area to your Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and Health-related Linguistic Research, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you may S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Sad: Faculty out of Values), 41–77.

Arsenijevic, B., and you will Mitic, We. (2016b). To the into the reliance off sex regarding number in agreement with matched sufferers: an experimental study. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 41–69.

Ba). Morphology, agreement and dealing recollections retrieval from inside the sentence production: research of intercourse and you can situation inside the Slovak best dating apps to meet single women girls in Los Angeles. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.

Hairdresser, H., and you may Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical sex and number contract during the Foreign-language: An enthusiastic ERP research. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.

Bhatt, R., and you will Walkow, Yards. (2013). Finding agreement within the sentence structure: a quarrel away from contract within the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Principle 29, 951–1013.

Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.

Lme4: Linear Blended-Effects Habits Having fun with S4 Kinds

Carminati, Yards. (2005). Processing reflexes of your own function ladder (person > matter > gender) and ramifications for linguistic principle. Lingua 115, 259–285.

Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation because of the Stage,” inside Ken Hale. A lifetime inside Code, ed. Meters. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Force), 1–52.

Citko, B. (2004). “Arrangement asymmetries within the enhance structures,” within the Specialized Approaches to Slavic linguistics: The fresh new Ottawa Fulfilling 2003, eds A great. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you may D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications), 91–108.

De Vincenzi, Meters. (1999). Differences when considering the fresh new morphology out-of intercourse and you can amount: research out-of creating coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28, 537–553.

De Vincenzi, M., and you will Di Domenico, Elizabeth. (1999). A difference one of ?-features: the brand new part from gender and you will amount on retrieval away from pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.

Doron, Elizabeth. (2000). “VSO and you can kept-conjunct arrangement : biblical Hebrew vs. progressive Hebrew,” from the Syntax of Verb Initially Languages, eds Good. Carnie and Elizabeth. Guilfoyle (New york, NY: Oxford College or university Force), 75–96.